Posts tagged day trading

Free Trading Course

Facts On Futures

While losses can and do occur both in stocks and commodities, here are some facts on futures that should prove informative:

  • Warren Buffett’s best performing investment since July 25, 1997, has been in commodities (silver), up 66% according to a February 9, 1998, Wall Street Journal article. Thus far, silver surpasses gains of even his best stock, Walt Disney (+37%).
  • According to Jim Rodgers, in 1996 the Goldman Sachs Commodity Index outperformed every major stock index in the world.
  • In 1996, futures were the best performing portion of Harvard University’s portfolio, returning 46%.
  • The average CTA tracked by Managed Account Reports from 1994-1996 returned 31.1%.**
  • Of 119 commodity funds and pools ranked by MAR from 1990 through October 1996, 81% were profitable.**
  • In 1997, 82.5% of commodity pools tracked by MAR were positive with 51% experiencing double-digit returns.**
  • In 1973 and 1974, when stocks dropped 41%, commodity prices soared 114%.
  • When the S&P 500 fell nearly 30% from September to November of 1987, managed futures rose 10%.
  • While the S&P 500 fell 15% during Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait, managed futures rose 19%.

These statistics show futures on their own can be an attractive investment. However, we believe futures most attractive feature is in offering profound diversification to a stock and bond portfolio. Studies show futures can increase the performance and reduce overall portfolio risk when combined with stocks.*

Introduction

“Trading commodities is the world’s one perfect business”, or so some people say, but is it for you? This is something that you must decide for yourself and hopefully after this course you, will agree that it really is the world’s one perfect business.

I started trading a few years ago and have found that it’s the most exciting business I’ve ever been in. Yes, I said business. It’s not a game, it’s a business. If you don’t treat it like a business you won’t reap the many rewards that are available to you; at least not in the long run. It can be a part time business or a full-time business, but it’s still a business.

I now have a freedom that I’ve never had before. Not only do I have a business that can provide financial freedom; it’s much more than that. I work a couple of hours a day on trading, not every day mind you, and then the rest of the day I have to myself. I decide, not someone else, what I do all day. I have time freedom, I have financial freedom, I have a “job” that I can do anywhere in the world. I have the ability to provide a comfortable lifestyle for my family. And equally important, I have fun!

Let me tell you a few of the things I don’t have. I don’t have a boss, I don’t have employees, I don’t have deadlines, I don’t have office rent, I don’t have meetings to attend, I don’t have to worry about rush hour traffic, I don’t have to worry about being laid off or fired, I don’t have to wear a suit and tie everyday, I don’t have customers, I don’t have inventory, I don’t have to play office politics, I don’t…… Well I hope you get the picture.

Get In Or Get Out

If You Can’t Get 100% Into What You’re Doing, Then, You’d Better Get 100% Out Of What You’re Doing.

Before I learned, (yes I said learned) to trade, I had several different businesses. Some successful, some not so successful, and some that went straight down the tubes along with more money than I care to remember. Then, one day, I looked at what I was doing with my life and discovered I wasn’t really happy, wasn’t really successful, wasn’t really satisfied and I wasn’t really making any money. Ever been there? It’s called “burnout.” That’s when I decided to get 100% out of what I was doing. But I didn’t think I had many choices at the time. Little did I know that my life was about to change, and change in a big way.

I was introduced to trading through an offer in the mail and like many others bought a mail order course. I learned enough to be dangerous. I thought that was all I needed to know. Boy, oh boy, was I wrong. I hadn’t even learned the basics but jumped in anyway and started trading. I won’t go into all the details, but I will say that I “paid” over $10,000 for that course. This is one of the reasons I wrote and teach this course; so that you don’t do the stupid things that I did when I first started trading.

I later learned that the person who put out this course, was a great promoter, but his trading methods were a far cry from what someone needed to know to trade for a living. I then went to work reading and studying everything I could about commodities. I invested the time to learn. I invested in good books. I invested in good tapes, good videos, and spent a year studying and paper trading. Paper trading is simply trading an account on paper without using real money. It’s a great learning tool.

There is no one course that is going to teach you everything you need to know to trade successfully, and that includes this course. What this course can do, is to teach you many of the basics and give you a good foundation to build on. Learning anything is a continuing process and the longer and harder you work at it, the better you become.

What I found is that most of the books and courses talk about the same things, just explaining it in a little different way. That’s when I realized that there are some basic principals, rules if you will, that anyone can learn and once you do, you can be a successful trader.

Commodities Yesterday-Today-Tomorrow

Yesterday

Back in the mid-1800’s the McCormick reaper was invented which greatly enhanced the production of wheat in America. About the same time, Chicago was becoming a major commercial center. Wheat farmers from across the country were coming to Chicago to sell their wheat to the grain dealers who then sold it to commercial buyers all over the county.

At that time, Chicago had almost no place to store wheat and poor methods for weighing and grading it. This left the farmer at the mercy of the wheat dealer.

In 1848, a central exchange was formed where farmers and dealers could meet to deal in “spot” grain which is selling wheat for cash and delivered immediately.

Soon after this farmers and dealers began to deal in “futures contracts.” This simply means that the farmer (seller) would contract with a dealer (buyer) to deliver wheat at a specific date in the future for a pre-determined price. Hence, the name “futures” trading evolved. This worked well for both parties as the farmer knew in advance how much he was going to be paid and the dealer knew his cost beforehand.

These contacts became so common that banks started to take them as collateral for bank loans. Sometimes the farmer might not want to deliver the product and would sell his contract to another farmer who would take on the obligation to deliver. Other times the dealer might not want to take delivery and would then sell his contract to someone who wanted to take delivery. Before long, speculators, who saw an opportunity to buy and sell these contracts, hopefully at a profit, came into play. These were the first commodities “traders” as we know them today and they had no intention of ever buying or selling wheat. They began trading these contracts hoping to buy low and sell high or sell high and buy low. Read the rest of this entry »

Expectancy: What it is and Why you NEED to have it !

Expectancy

Las Vegas. Great food, show girls, and a multi-billion dollar gambling business. The money made by the casinos is only matched by the profits on Wall Street. And the profits of both are based on mathematical probabilities.

Casinos make money because “the odds” or a game’s expectancy are in the house‘s favor. This means that if you play long enough, the casino wins. Over the short term, the casino knows it may win or lose. But if you play long enough, the house always wins. The casinos increase their profits by offering games that are completed in a short period of time – a roll of dice, a spin of a wheel or a few cards turned over.

What does this have to do with trading systems?

  • We want the odds of a trade to favor us – expectancy
  • We want a lot of trades – opportunity
  • We want turn over so we can compound the profits – holding time.

What we as traders must do is become the house. The odds in our trading must favor us, we need a reasonable number of trades during the year and the trades must be completed in a reasonable amount of time for compounding to be effective.

Expectancy is simply the product of your profit percentage per win and your win rate minus the product of your loss percentage per loss and your loss rate. For example:

  • Win percentage 6%
  • Win rate 60%
  • Loss percentage 4%
  • Loss rate 40%.

The expectancy is 2.0% per trade, or (6% x 60%) – (4% x 40%).

That means, on an average trade, 2% of the money traded is yours to keep. That’s better odds than a casino gets on blackjack. Now, that may not sound like a lot of money. If your average trade is $10,000 – 2% is $200 profit per trade. If you have 300 trades per year, then you have a $60,000 profit per year with an average trade of only $10,000. This does not even include the profits if you compounded the average trade.

If you explore the expectancy formula, you will notice that there is no one set of numbers that could give a positive expectancy but an infinite number of sets and therefore an infinite number of trading systems that could be profitable.

Given that, it is possible to develop systems where the stop loss is larger than the profits. The stop loss is academic, as long as your profit expectancy is positive.

Here’s another example: we could use a 20% stop loss and a 5% profit target and come out with the same exact 2% expectancy as long as my win rate is high enough! An 88% win rate in this example would yield 2.0%, the result of (5% x 88%) – (20% x 12%).

Or, you could arrive at a positive expectancy with a very low win rate. One of the more famous expectancy numbers comes from William O’Neil, advocate of the CANSLIM system and founder of Investors Business Daily. If we use his stop and target numbers of 8% and 20% and his published win rate of 30%, the expectancy can be calculated to be: (20% x 30%) – (8% x 70%) or +0.4%.

The bottom line is: expectancy must be positive if you want to make a profit over time. Never use a system with a zero or negative expectancy. You will not win. You can not beat the house over a long series of bets or trades. Be the “House”.

No matter what your expectancy is, you will not make a great deal of money unless you have a lot of opportunities to trade. Again, the casino analogy. The casino may only make 1-2% per hand of blackjack, but they turn over those hands very quickly – 30 to 40 hands per hour. Play blackjack long enough and you will lose over 40% of your money per hour! No wonder they can offer those wonderful comps.

We now know how to create a method, at least on paper, with a positive expectancy. Let’s say we develop a system with 8% expectancy, but if the system only yielded one trade per year, what good would it be? We might as well just put the money in a savings account. Or, if we had a method that yielded 0.2% per trade, you might pass on it? But what if that system generated 1,000 trades per year? 1,000 times 0.2% becomes serious money in a very short time.

The most overlooked area of trading is the “holding period.” In order to make money, you must have a system that generates a positive expectancy and a lot of opportunities. But you must have access to your money. If your trade’s hold time is too long, you can’t take advantage of all or even most of your opportunities. Your trading money or buying power is always tied up because you have to wait too long to close your trades.

Casino analogy time. If the house odds in Blackjack are 2.5%, that means for ever $2 bet, the casino makes, on average, 5 cents. If you only play 1 game per hour, the casino makes 5 cents per hour. If you play 60 games per hour, the casino has all of your $2 in 40 minutes. All things being equal, the game with the fastest turnover is the more profitable for the casino.

It’s no different with trading. You will be more profitable with $100,000 that you could “turn” 250 times per year, than $500,000 that was tied up in one trade for 12 months. As an example, let’s say we have one trade and that trade yielded a 50% return. You just had a great year – a $250,000 profit.

On the other hand, say you had $100,000 for stock purchases, and your expectancy was only 1.2% per trade but you turned over your stocks 250 times in the same year. This method ends up generating $300,000 for the year, and that assumes you never increase the position size as the equity grows. You just had a better year. And it is easier to get 1.2% per trade than 50%.

The bottom line for a great bottom line is:

  • A positive expectancy
  • A good number of trades
  • A short holding period

Courtesy of : http://www.arbtrading.com